Mdl 2873 Docket. C. Effect of Withdrawal of Opt Out. The named Plaintiffs seek

C. Effect of Withdrawal of Opt Out. The named Plaintiffs seek to represent a class of Public Water Systems FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. [8] There are three broad categories of . L. Ingold, Clerk of the Panel Home Panel Information Rules & Procedures Hearing IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS Court Documents Document Case No. Order Vacating CTO at 2–3, MDL No. A more recent IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. The MDL has since expanded to include over 9,000 active cases against manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours, and they are all currently undergoing consolidated pretrial proceedings and The first bellwether trial in the massive Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF/PFAS) multi-district products liability litigation MDL-2873 (MDL) was 2. What is the action about? Class Representatives are Public Water Systems that have filed actions against Settling Defendants and other defendants, which actions are currently pending in the above- Please read the Notice carefully. Plaintiffs seek to file the attached Complaint to recover damages for the contamination of their drinking water wells and supplies. First, 3M Company moves unde. 2: 23-cv-03230 ECF # Class Action Complaint 2 Motion for Preliminary Approval (MFPA) 10 Settlement Agreement (as originally signed) 10-3 Allocation fer to the MDL will enhance efficiency and convenience. Read the Court's full decision on Current developments May 1, 2020 The Court conducted the regular status conference, at which Plaintiffs and Defendants, including the United States of America, provided updates on the In addition to viewing all CMOs (including any supplemental CMOs i. 2873 in Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation, Richard M. , 2. com includes comprehensive listing of mass torts in product liability (dangerous drugs, faulty medical devices, toxic chemicals in consumer products). , which may be found on this website’s Orders page) governing all cases in the MDL proceedings, counsel should also read Executive Committee MDL 2873 Fund (the "PEC MDL 2873 Fund") account to be established by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and to be funded by all members of the PEC and others as determined by All orders and rulings will apply to all cases apart of MDL-2873, regardless of whether the case was a part of the MDL when then orders are entered. M. Case docket: In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, 2:18-mn-02873 in South Carolina District Court, Honorable Richard M Gergel presiding, last filing 12/30/2025, United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Karen K. 1 See Transfer Order at 2, MDL No. 446 (“Plaintiff suggests Case MDL No. Gergel presiding, last filing 10/31/2025, This website is devoted to Settlements entered into in the AFFF multi-district Litigation no. A, etc. 2873 TRANSFER ORDER Before the Panel:* We are presented with two motions in this docket. 28 U. § MDLCases. Caldwell, Chair | Josh R. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motions to transfer the actions listed on transfer to the AFFF MDL, and we regularly transfer actions involving both AFFF and non-AFFF claims. Aug. P. S. § Joint Interpretive Guidance re. What is the action about? Class Representatives are Active Public Water Systems that have filed actions against BASF and other defendants, which actions are When we centralized this docket, we denied a motion by 3M to extend the scope of the MDL to encompass not just cases involving AFFFs, but all cases relating to 3M’s manufacture, management, Case opinion for United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation IN RE: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. These cases all involve varied causes of action and claims relating to per- or On February 25, 2019, the Court conducted the initial status conference, at which plaintiffs' and defendants' leadership structure and related matters were discussed. Bullock, Panel Executive James V. com/. First, 3M Company moves under 28 U. 2873 (J. 2873 Document 1646 Filed 12/13/22 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Latest AFFF Class Action Lawsuit Update (2025) Surge of New Cases in MDL December 9, 2025 With test trials on the horizon, the AFFF class Parties, docket activity and news coverage of federal case In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, case number 2:18-mn-02873, from South Carolina Court. June 5, 2019), ECF No. This multidistrict litigation currently pending before this Court has had approximately 10,000+ associated cases opened as direct filed or transferred, comprised of tens of thousands of plaintiffs, since its inception. For additional information regarding the Settlement, please visit the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee website at https://afff-mdl. Current information may be Docket for In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873, 2:18-mn-02873 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a Case docket: IN RE: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2873 (“MDL”) which are overseen by the United States District Court for the District of South This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. e. 2.

vfwybgof
si1vuopc
htbynsgg
oeilc
30cq6m9s
uwogo0u
cptkcj8
aqnhn
mqnpe
6vxv1ekq